GENERAL POWERS

Showing posts with label GENERAL POWERS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GENERAL POWERS. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 25

MID-PASIG LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs. MARIO TABLANTE, doing business under the name and style ECRM ENTERPRISES, et al.



MID-PASIG LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs. MARIO TABLANTE, doing business under the name and style ECRM ENTERPRISES; ROCKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; LAURIE LITAM; and MC HOME DEPOT, INC.
G.R. No. 162924. February 4, 2010


FACTS:
Mid-Pasig Land is the registered owner of a piece of land situated in Pasig City.  On December 6, 1999, Mid-Pasig represented by its Chairman and President, Ronaldo Salonga, and ECRM Enterprises, represented by its proprietor, Mario Tablante, executed an agreement whereby the former would lease to the latter an area, approximately 1 hectare of the aforesaid land, for a period of 3 months, to be used as the staging area for the Home and Garden Exhibition Fair.

Mid-Pasig eventually learned that Tablante had executed a Contract of Lease with MC Home Depot, Inc. on November 26, 1999 over the same parcel of land. On March 6, 2000, the date of the expiration of the Lease Agreement, Tablante assigned all his rights and interests under the said agreement to Laurie Litam and/or Rockland Construction Company, Inc. under a Deed of Assignment. On the same date, Mid-Pasig demanded that respondents vacate the land.

Rockland filed a case for SP with the RTC, compelling Mid-Pasig to execute a new lease contract for another 3 years. Consequently, Mid-Pasig filed a case for unlawful detainer against respondents to the MTC.

In the case of UD, the trial court held that it has no jurisdiction over the subject matter because it is incapable of pecuniary estimation. On appeal, the RTC affirmed in toto.  The CA resolved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the verification and certification against non-forum shopping was signed by a certain Antonio A. Merelos as General Manager of the Mid-Pasig without attaching therewith a Corporate Secretary's certificate or board resolution that he is authorized to sign for and on behalf of the petitioner.

ISSUE:
Whether or not the General Manager may sign the verification and CANFS on behalf of the corporation even without Corp Sec's cert or board resolution

HELD:
YES. The General Manager may sign the verification and CANFS on behalf of the corporation even without Corp Sec's cert or board resolution.
In Sec. 23, in relation to Sec. 25 of the Corporation Code, clearly provides that all corporate powers are exercised, all business conducted, and all properties controlled by the board of directors. A corporation has a separate and distinct personality from its directors and officers and can only exercise its corporate powers through the BOD. Thus, it is clear that an individual corporate officer cannot solely exercise any corporate power pertaining to the corporation without authority from the BOD.
HOWEVER, it is recognized the authority of some corporate officers to sign the verification and certification against forum shopping without need of a board resolution:
(1) The Chairperson of the Board of Directors;
(2) The President of a corporation;
(3) The General Manager or Acting General Manager;
(4) Personnel Officer; and
(5) An Employment Specialist in a labor case. 

The determination of the sufficiency of the authority was done on a case to case basis. In the case at bar, it is thus clear that the failure to attach the Secretary's Certificate, attesting to GM Antonio Merelos's authority to sign the Verification and Certification of Non-Forum Shopping, should not be considered fatal to the filing of the petition. Nonetheless, the requisite board resolution was subsequently submitted to the CA, together with the pertinent documents. Considering that petitioner substantially complied with the rules, the dismissal of the petition was, therefore, unwarranted