DIRECTOR OF LANDS vs. COURT OF APPEALS
DIRECTOR OF LANDS vs. COURT OF
APPEALS
G.R. NO. 83609
OCTOBER 26, 1989
PONENTE: GRIÑO-AQUINO, J.
FACTS:
On July 20, 1976, Ibarra and Amelia Bisnar,
the private respondents, claimed to be the owners of two parcels of lands
situated in Capiz and filed a joint application for registration of title to
the said lands.
On December 16, 1976, the Director of Lands
and Bureau of Forest Development opposed the application on the grounds that
the respondents were not applicants neither predecessors-in-interest to possess
sufficient title to acquire ownership and that the lands in question are a
portion of the public domain belonging to the State.
On February 24, 1977, the respondents filed
an amended application which was approved on March 14, 1977.
The CFI of Capiz held on granting the
application for confirmation and registration of the two parcels of land filed
by private respondents. It found that applicants and their
predecessors-in-interest have been in open, public, continuous, peaceful and adverse
possession of the subject parcels of land under bona fide claims of ownership
for more than eighty (80) years (not only 30) prior to the filing of the application
for registration, introduced improvements on the lands by planting coconuts,
bamboos and other plants, and converted a part of the land into productive
fishponds.
The respondent court affirmed the decision in toto, and it held that the classification of
the lots as timberland by the Director of Forestry cannot prevail in the
absence of proof that the said lots are indeed more valuable as forest land than
as agricultural land. Thereafter, the
Director of Lands through the OSG filed a petition before this Court for the
review of the said decision.
ISSUE:
Whether the lots in question may be
registered under Section 48(b) of CA 141
HELD:
No. The lots cannot be registered under Section 48(b) of CA 141.
A positive act of the government is needed to declassify land
which is classified as forest and to convert it into alienable or disposable
land for agricultural or other purposes. A parcel of forest land is within the
exclusive jurisdiction of the Bureau of Forestry and beyond the power and
jurisdiction of the cadastral court to register under the Torrens System
Hence, Section
48 (b) of Commonwealth Act No. 141, as amended, applies exclusively to public agricultural
land. Forest lands or areas covered with forests are excluded.
0 comments :
Post a Comment